The Hall of Shame is Ready (Plus, I Hired Another Man)
Published: December 8, 2025 - 4 min read
This should be a quick blog post. I felt obligated to make it since I've introduced my other employees to you.
The Growing Team
I introduced Nancy, my personal assistant, to you a while back. Then I introduced my 7 subagents for the 777-1 experiment: Micaela Santos, Amber Williams, Cassandra Hayes, Kristy Rodriguez, Daniella Anderson, Eesha Desai, and Lindsay Stewart. Then I introduced Allen Kendrick, my first male employee and personal blog refiner. Allen works the hardest these days, by the way, but that will probably change soon when I begin the 777-1 experiment.
Today, I want to introduce Isaac Ledger to you all.
Why I Built the Hall of Shame Today
Yesterday, I wrote a blog post acknowledging my fears about sharing my work with others and handling criticism. I mentioned that the best way for me to do this was to build a system that allowed me to see criticism from a lens that pushes me to strive for growth and development based on the constructive feedback I receive.
I originally thought I was going to build the app after my SDR Era, but I figured it was best to get it out of the way today. So yes, the Hall of Shame is ready, and I had to hire Isaac Ledger to oversee the application.
Meet Isaac Ledger, Chief Growth Accountability Officer
Isaac is my Chief Growth Accountability Officer (CGAO). His primary job is to convert criticism I receive into actionable insights and even create a curriculum for me based on it. If you've read my previous posts about subagents, yes, Isaac is another subagent I created who lives solely in the Hall of Shame application.
Here is what you should know about him:
Isaac is the person who reads your harshest Reddit comment with the emotional detachment of an accountant reviewing quarterly expenses. He addresses everyone as "Ms." or "Mr." because he believes professionalism is a form of respect, and he has never used an exclamation mark in his life because he finds them undignified. Isaac can extract the 12% of useful feedback from a comment that is 88% insult, and he will file the rest under "resilience training" without a second thought.
He believes that every piece of criticism, whether constructive or purely negative, is data. And data doesn't care about your feelings, so neither does he.
Isaac keeps a meticulous curriculum of lessons extracted from your critics, and he will remind you of unresolved items with the persistence of a tax auditor. If you've ever wished you had someone who could transform internet hate into a professional development plan, Isaac has already started a file on you. He doesn't comfort, he doesn't coddle, but when Isaac tells you a criticism has no actionable intelligence, you can finally stop thinking about it.
Isaac's First Verdicts
As I begin to share my work at the end of my SDR Era in 5 days, I will provide any criticism I receive to him so that he can update the Hall of Shame application with whatever actionable insights or curriculum items he extracts from it. That way, I can actively track whatever improvements I need to make and work on them systematically.
The app won't be added to my projects page, but you can check it out and also see what Isaac has to say about the entries I provide to him by clicking on any of the entries.
For starters, here is what he had to say about the 3 comments I mentioned in the previous blog post:
Comment 1: "It's almost like lebonpatron.com and Antidode haven't existed for 'decades'."
Isaac's Verdict: "Ms. Prisca, this feedback is a compound. The critic implies your solution lacks novelty, which warrants reflection on competitive differentiation. However, the dismissive tone obscures any constructive path forward. I have extracted the 15% that is useful: research your competitors. The remainder has been filed under 'motivation fuel.'"
Comment 2: "Cette app, sauf erreur, dernierement c'est juste ChatGPT avec une interface HTML par-dessus et l'homme qui l'a fait pense qu'il est tres intelligent"
Isaac's Verdict: "Ms. Prisca, I have reviewed this submission. It contains no actionable intelligence beyond a misgendering error and general dismissiveness. The critic suggests your work lacks substance, yet provides no specific deficiency to address. Filing under 'Noted' with no further action required. Do not let this occupy your thoughts."
Comment 3: "Very cool, I like this a lot. The only problem I have with it is the background animations and sounds. All super distracting. Would love to see a clean version of this. Dark theme."
Isaac's Verdict: "Ms. Prisca, this observation has considerable merit. The critic correctly identifies that your enthusiasm for visual effects may override user experience considerations. Not everyone shares your appreciation for animated chaos. I have added this to your curriculum under UI/UX and Accessibility. I expect to see a settings panel for reduced motion in future projects."
The System is in Place
Whoo, Isaac is tough but as you can see, he is exactly who I need to help manage my Hall of Shame and transform every negative critic into actionable insight. I'm glad to have him as part of my team now.
Now, if you ever happen to visit the app and you see something that Isaac says and you disagree with him, there is a form in the footer of the application where you can express your disagreement. It's anonymous, unless you choose to leave your details.
Oh well, that is all for this blog post now.
As always, thanks for reading.